公告 Announcement

20世紀末至21 世紀初是由「無電腦時代」進入「全電腦時代」的重要轉折關鍵,回想數十年前一般人尚不知「電腦」為何物?但在今日卻行、住、坐、臥皆離不開電腦,「數位資訊」成了當代重要命題,對各領域造成重大影響。其中頗令人注意者,即「觀念」在「數位時代」中的頻繁流動,造成「觀念」自身快速地不斷被置換與洗汰。而「觀念」作為人們行動意志的主導,更令我們有必要在這觀念「瞬生即滅」的時代,透過觀念史的研究,掌握百年來觀念之流動過程,唯有理解諸多觀念的發展,才能較好地理解為何現在藝術作品、建築設計不再那麼重視對稱與秩序,而專主於特殊造構,若不從「觀念」入手則難以解釋,若從「觀念」入手,才能發現這是由於當代人們的「審美意識」隨著以「奇」代「美」之觀念變動而產生的改變。因此唯有理解「觀念」的變動與發展,才能較好地解釋這世界的諸多行動,這正是「觀念」研究於當代之必要性所在,而這是一個觀念討論的空間 ,歡迎大家來討論並重新界義「觀念」!

2013年2月19日 星期二

Money, Happiness and Culture

Author: Aaron

Our new cabinet plans to issue our domestic “Happiness Index” this year. Happiness, as we know, is a kind of subjective concept and it could be different from every individuals according to the life value, economic status even and nationwide culture.

So, start from the fundamental-material aspect-could be more practical and reasonable.The most-asked question about this aspect must be: how much money makes us happy? According to the research made by Princeton Professors Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton, the threshold is $75,000; that is, around NT$ 2,200,000 dollars. Back to review our domestic statistic data, our average current receipts per household of 2011 is NT$1,157,895 dollars. On the other hand, the threshold of 90% household disposable income is NT$ 1,612,282. To sum up, most people income in Taiwan(R. O. C.) have not reached the basic standard of happiness mentioned above.

However, could we make the judge that most Taiwanese is unhappy according to the statistic data? Of course not. As I said, happiness is a subjective and complex concept. It’s impossible to evaluate it by one-dimension measure. So, we have to keep eves on the cultural aspect, especially the “relative” character of happiness, not just on the material one.

 “Inequality rather than want is the cause of trouble,” Confucius said. That is, in out society, whether we feel satisfied or not eventually depends on the gap between each others. So, the wider the income gap is, the unhappier people feel. According to this principled stand, we go back to check another statistic again.

 In Taiwan, it’s 4.14 when it comes to the ratio of highest 20% per capita share income to lowest 20%. Comparing to other main nations, only FinlandGermanyLuxembourgNorway and Sweden are under 5. As for nearby Asia nation, such like Singapore(12.75), Malaysia(11.44), South Korea(5.73), Japan(5.13) and China(9.58), are all above 5. Of course there is significant correlation with the domestic social welfare policy, which make impact on low-income household and individuals. For the past decades, because of the public expectation and political manipulation, Taiwan social welfare budget is growing and in 2011 it has been up to about 21% GDP of Taiwan. Under the situation, people should feel happy, but of course the fact is not.

 Among the main nations, Brazil is considered one of the happiest nations around the world; however, it has the largest income gap between the wealthy and the poor(20.21). So we still have to consider another factors which affect our feeling of happiness.

Some said it’s much more likely about the personality of people: Latin people always look on sunny side of life. Of course, it should be taken into consideration. But we all realize that it could not have a final consequence. That’s exactly because the “subjective” character of happiness. What we have to do is placing this topic in the broader context and keeping cross-culture conversation.

References
中華民國主計總處台灣地區家庭收支調查(http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/a11.asp?year=100)

沒有留言:

張貼留言